Romans 7:7 What then shall we say? Is the law sin? May it not be. But the sin I knew not, except through the law; for also lust I knew not, except the law said, You shall not lust.

ABP_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5100 What G3767 then G2046 shall we say? G3588 Is the G3551 law G266 sin? G3361 May it not G1096 be. G235 But G3588 the G266 sin G3756 I knew not, G1097 G1508 except G1223 through G3551 the law; G3588 G5037 for also G1063 G1939 lust G3756 I knew not, G1492 G1508 except G3588 the G3551 law G3004 said, G3756 You shall not G1937 lust.

ABP_GRK⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5100 τι G3767 ούν G2046 ερούμεν G3588 ο G3551 νόμος G266 αμαρτία G3361 μη G1096 γένοιτο G235 αλλά G3588 την G266 αμαρτίαν G3756 ουκ έγνων G1097 G1508 ει μη G1223 διά G3551 νόμου G3588 την G5037 τε γαρ G1063 G1939 επιθυμίαν G3756 ουκ ήδειν G1492 G1508 ει μη G3588 ο G3551 νόμος G3004 έλεγεν G3756 ουκ G1937 επιθυμήσεις

Stephanus⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησεις

Tischendorf⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 I-ASN Τί G3767 CONJ οὖν G2046 V-FAI-1P ἐροῦμεν; G3588 T-NSM ὁ G3551 N-NSM νόμος G266 N-NSF ἁμαρτία; G3361 PRT-N μὴ G1096 V-2ADO-3S γένοιτο· G235 CONJ ἀλλὰ G3588 T-ASF τὴν G266 N-ASF ἁμαρτίαν G3756 PRT-N οὐκ G1097 V-2AAI-1S ἔγνων G1487 COND εἰ G3361 PRT-N μὴ G1223 PREP διὰ G3551 N-GSM νόμου, G3588 T-ASF τήν G5037 PRT τε G1063 CONJ γὰρ G1939 N-ASF ἐπιθυμίαν G3756 PRT-N οὐκ G1492 V-LAI-1S ᾔδειν G1487 COND εἰ G3361 PRT-N μὴ G3588 T-NSM ὁ G3551 N-NSM νόμος G3004 V-IAI-3S ἔλεγεν, G3756 PRT-N οὐκ G1937 V-FAI-2S ἐπιθυμήσεις.

Tregelles⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷
Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων, εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν, εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν, Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·

Nestle⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·

SBLGNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου, τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν· Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·

f35⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ τι ουν ερουμεν ο νομος αμαρτια μη γενοιτο αλλα την αμαρτιαν ουκ εγνων ει μη δια νομου την τε γαρ επιθυμιαν ουκ ηδειν ει μη ο νομος ελεγεν ουκ επιθυμησειv

IGNT⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 τι What G3767 ουν Then G2046 (G5692) ερουμεν Shall We Say? G3588 ο "is" The G3551 νομος Law G266 αμαρτια Sin? G3361 μη May G1096 (G5636) γενοιτο It Not Be! G235 αλλα G3588 την But G266 αμαρτιαν Sin G3756 ουκ I G1097 (G5627) εγνων Knew Not G1487 ει G3361 μη Unless G1223 δια By G3551 νομου Law : G3588 την G5037 τε Also G1063 γαρ For G1939 επιθυμιαν Lust G3756 ουκ I Had G1492 (G5715) ηδειν Not Been Conscious G1487 ει Of G3361 μη Unless G3588 ο The G3551 νομος Law G3004 (G5707) ελεγεν Said, G3756 ουκ Not G1937 (G5692) επιθυμησεις Thou Shalt Lust;

ACVI⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 I-ASN τι What? G2046 V-FAI-1P ερουμεν Will We Say G3767 CONJ ουν Then G3588 T-NSM ο Tho G3551 N-NSM νομος Law G266 N-NSF αμαρτια Sin G1096 V-2ADO-3S γενοιτο May It Happen G3361 PRT-N μη Not G235 CONJ αλλα Yet G1097 V-2AAI-1S εγνων I Did Not G3756 PRT-N ουκ Not G3588 T-ASF την Tha G266 N-ASF αμαρτιαν Sin G1487 COND ει If G3361 PRT-N μη Not G1223 PREP δια Through G3551 N-GSM νομου Law G1063 CONJ γαρ For G5037 PRT τε Likewise G3756 PRT-N ουκ Not G1492 V-LAI-1S ηδειν I Would Have Known G3588 T-ASF την Tha G1939 N-ASF επιθυμιαν Lust G1487 COND ει If G3588 T-NSM ο Tho G3551 N-NSM νομος Law G3361 PRT-N μη Not G3004 V-IAI-3S ελεγεν Said G3756 PRT-N ουκ Not G1937 V-AAM-2S επιθυμησεις Shall Thou Covet

new⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 [G5692] shall we say G3767 then? G3551 Is the law G266 sin? G3361 G1096 [G5636] By no means. G235 Nay, G1097 0 I had G3756 not G1097 [G5627] known G266 sin, G1508 but G1223 by G3551 the law: G1063 G5037 for G1492 0 I had G3756 not G1492 [G5715] known G1939 lust, G1508 except G3551 the law G3004 [G5707] had said, G1937 0 Thou shalt G3756 not G1937 [G5692] covet.

Vulgate⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ quid ergo dicemus lex peccatum est absit sed peccatum non cognovi nisi per legem nam concupiscentiam nesciebam nisi lex diceret non concupisces

Clementine_Vulgate⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces.

Wycliffe⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What therfor schulen we seie? The lawe is synne? God forbede. But Y knew not synne, but bi lawe; for Y wiste not that coueitynge was synne, but for the lawe seide, Thou schalt not coueyte.

Tyndale⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we saye then? is ye lawe synne? God forbid: but I knewe not what synne meant but by the lawe. For I had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust.

Coverdale⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shal we saye then? Is the lawe synne? God forbyd: Neuertheles I knewe not synne, but by ye lawe. For I had knowne nothinge of lust, yf the lawe had not sayde: Thou shalt not lust.

MSTC⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid: but I knew not what sin meant but by the law. For I had not known what lust had meant, except the law had said, "Thou shalt not lust."

Matthew⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we saye then? Is the lawe synne? God forbid: but I knewe not what synne meante but by the law. For I had not knowne what luste had meant, except the lawe had sayed, thou shalte, not lust.

Great⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we saye then? is the lawe synne? God forbyd: neuertheles I knew not synne, but by the lawe. For I had not knowne what lust had meant, excepte the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust.

Geneva⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.

Bishops⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the lawe sinne? God forbyd. Neuerthelesse, I knewe not sinne, but by the lawe: For I had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayde, thou shalt not lust

DouayRheims⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? God forbid! But I do not know sin, but by the law. For I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: Thou shalt not covet.

KJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

KJV_Cambridge⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

KJV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 shall we say [G5692] G3767 then G3551 ? Is the law G266 sin G3361 ? God forbid G1096 [G5636] G235 . Nay G1097 , I had G3756 not G1097 known [G5627] G266 sin G1508 , but G1223 by G3551 the law G1063 : for G5037 G1492 I had G3756 not G1492 known [G5715] G1939 lust G1508 , except G3551 the law G3004 had said [G5707] G1937 , Thou shalt G3756 not G1937 covet [G5692] .

Mace⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Do we then conclude, that the law is the cause of sin? by no means; but I should not have had such a notion of sin, had it not been for the law: for I should not have known concupiscence was a sin, unless the law had said, "thou shalt not covet."

Whiston⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Wesley⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? That the law is sin? God forbid. Yea, I should not have known sin, but for the law. I had not known lust, unless the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Worsley⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? is the law sin? God forbid! Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust to be sinful, if the law had not said, "Thou shalt not covet."

Haweis⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the law sin? God forbid. Yea, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not even known concupiscence, unless the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Thomson⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? No, by no means. Indeed I should not have known sin, had it not been for the law. For I should not have known covetousness, had not the law said, "Thou shall not covet"

Webster⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Webster_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 [G5692] shall we say G3767 then G3551 ? Is the law G266 sin G3361 G1096 [G5636] ? By no means G235 . Nay G1097 0 , I had G3756 not G1097 [G5627] known G266 sin G1508 , but G1223 by G3551 the law G1063 G5037 : for G1492 0 I had G3756 not G1492 [G5715] known G1939 lust G1508 , except G3551 the law G3004 [G5707] had said G1937 0 , Thou shalt G3756 not G1937 [G5692] covet.

Living_Oracles⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? By no means. Indeed, I had not known sin, except by the law. For I had not known even inordinate desire, unless the law had said, "You shall not lust."

Etheridge⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then, say we the law is sin? Not so. But sin I had not learned (to know) but by the law: for I had not known concupiscence (to be sinful), but (by) the law, which hath said, Thou shalt not covet.

Murdock⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin?, Far be it. For I had not learned sin, except by means of the law: for I had not known concupiscence, had not the law said, Thou shalt not covet:

Sawyer⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ ^(5:2) What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. On the contrary I knew not sin except through the law; for I had not known inordinate desire, unless the law had said, You shall not desire inordinately.

Diaglott⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? the law sin? Not let it be; but the sin not I knew, if not through law; the even for strong desire not I knew, if not the law said: Not thou shalt lust.

ABU⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Far be it! But I had not known sin, except through law; for I had not known coveting, if the law had not said: Thou shalt not covet.

Anderson⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? It can not be. Indeed, I had not known sin, except through law. For I had not known evil desire, unless the law had said: You shall not have any evil desire.

Noyes⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? God forbid! But I should not have known sin, except by the Law; for I should not have known sinful desire, unless the Law had said, "Thou shalt not covet."

YLT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we say? the law is sin? let it not be! but the sin I did not know except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the law had not said:

JuliaSmith⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? The law sin? It may not be. But I knew not sin except by the law: for I knew not lust, if the law said not, Thou shalt not eagerly desire.

Darby⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? [is] the law sin? Far be the thought. But I had not known sin, unless by law: for I had not had conscience also of lust unless the law had said, Thou shalt not lust;

ERV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

ASV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

ASV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 shall we say G3767 then? G3551 Is the law G3361 sin? G1096 God forbid. G235 Howbeit, G1097 I had G3756 not G1097 known G1487 sin, G3361 except G1223 through G3551 the law: G1063 for G1492 I had G3756 not G1492 known G1487 coveting, G3361 except G3551 the law G3004 had said, G1937 Thou shalt G3756 not G1937 covet:

JPS_ASV_Byz⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law; for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

Rotherham⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Far be it! On the contrary, I had not discovered, sin, save through law, for even, of coveting, I had not been aware if, the law, had not kept on saying––Thou shall not covet;

Twentieth_Century⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What are we to say, then? That Law and sin are the same thing? Heaven forbid! On the contrary, I should not have learned what sin is, had not it been for Law. If the Law did not say 'Thou shalt not covet,' I should not know what it is to covet.

Godbey⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Then what shall we say? is the law sin? It could not be so; but I did not know sin except through the law: for indeed I had not known lusts, unless the law said, Thou shalt not covet.

WNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What follows? Is the Law itself a sinful thing? No, indeed; on the contrary, unless I had been taught by the Law, I should have known nothing of sin as sin. For instance, I should not have known what covetousness is, if the Law had not repeatedly said, "THOU SHALT NOT COVET."

Worrell⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? It could not be! But I had not known sin, except through law; for I would not know even coveting, if the law did not say, "You shall not covet;"

Moffatt⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What follows, then? That 'the Law is equivalent to sin'? Never! Why, had it not been for the Law, I would never have known what sin meant! Thus I would never have known what it is to covet, unless the Law had said, You must not covet.

Goodspeed⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Then what shall we conclude? That the Law is sin? Certainly not! Yet, if it had not been for the Law, I should never have learned what sin was; I should not have known what it was to covet if the Law had not said, "You must not covet."

Riverside⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Never. But I should not have come to know sin except through the Law. I should not have known lust if the Law had not said, "Thou shalt not lust."

MNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Certainly not. On the contrary I should not have become acquainted with sin had it not been for the Law; for except the Law had repeatedly said, "Thou shalt not lust," I should never have known the sin of lust.

Lamsa⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Far be it. I would not have known the meaning of sin, except by means of the law: for I would never have known the meaning of lust, except the law said, Thou shalt not covet.

CLV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we declare? That the law is sin? May it not be coming to that! But sin I knew not except through law. For besides, I had not been aware of coveting except the law said, "You shall not be coveting."

Williams⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What are we then to conclude? Is the law sin? Of course not! Yet, if it had not been for the law, I should not have learned what sin was, for I should not have known what an evil desire was, if the law had not said, "You must not have an evil desire."

BBE⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then is to be said? is the law sin? in no way. But I would not have had knowledge of sin but for the law: for I would not have been conscious of desire if the law had not said, You may not have a desire for what is another's.

MKJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Let it not be said! But I did not know sin except through the law. For also I did not know lust except the law said, You shall not lust.

LITV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through law; for also I did not know lust except the law said, "You shall not lust." Ex. 20:17

ECB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ So what say we? Is the torah sin? So be it not. Rather, I knew not sin, except through the torah: nor knew I panting, except the torah worded, Pant not.

AUV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law of Moses sinful? Certainly not! For I would not have known what sin was if it had not been for the law. For [example]; I would not have known [what it meant] to covet [i.e., have a strong desire for what belongs to someone else] except that the law said [Ex. 20:17], “You must not covet.”

ACV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What will we say then? The law is sin? May it not happen! Yet I did not know sin except through law. For likewise I would not have known lust, if the law did not say, Thou shall not covet.

Common⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "You shall not covet."

WEB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin, except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting, unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

WEB_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 shall we say G3767 then? G3551 Is the law G3361 sin? G1096 May it never be! G235 However, G3756 I wouldn't G1097 have G1097 known G1487 sin, G3361 except G1223 through G3551 the law. G1063 For G3756 I wouldn't G1492 have G1492 known G1487 coveting, G3361 unless G3551 the law G3004 had said, G1937 "You shall G3756 not G1937 covet."

NHEB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not. However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness, unless the law had said, "Do not covet."

AKJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, You shall not covet.

AKJV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 shall we say G3767 then? G3551 Is the law G266 sin? G3361 God G1096 G3361 forbid. G1096 G235 No, G1097 I had not known G266 sin, G3551 but by the law: G1492 for I had not known G1939 lust, G1508 except G3551 the law G3004 had said, G1937 You shall not covet.

KJC⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, You shall not covet.

KJ2000⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, you shall not covet.

UKJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, You shall not covet.

RKJNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. On the contrary, I would not have known sin, but by the law: for I would not have known about coveting unless the law had said, You shall not covet.

CKJV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 What G2046 shall we say G3767 then? G3551 Is the law G3361 sin? G1096 God forbid. G235 No, G1097 I had G3756 not G1097 known G1487 sin, G3361 but G1223 by G3551 the law: G1063 for G1492 I had G3756 not G1492 known G1487 lust, G3361 except G3551 the law G3004 had said, G1937 You shall G3756 not G1937 covet.

RYLT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we say? the law is sin? let it not be! but the sin I did not know except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the law had not said:

EJ2000⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ ¶ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? No, in no wise. But, I did not know sin except by the law; for neither would I have known lust if the law did not say, Thou shalt not covet.

CAB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known lust unless the law had said, "You shall not covet."

WPNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ So what shall we say then? Is the law sin? Of course not! Indeed, I would not have come to know the sin except through the law: I would not have recognized covetousness if the law had not said, “You must not covet”.

JMNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What, then, shall we say (or: declare)? [Is] the Law (or: custom) sin (error; failure to hit the target; deviation from the goal)? Certainly not (May it not come to be)! Instead (or: But rather) I did not (or: do not) at any point experientially and intimately know the Sin, if not through Law ([= Torah]; or: custom). For besides, I had not seen and thus had not known (become conscious of) the full passion (earnest desire; lust; coveting; emotion upon something) if the Law and the custom were not continuously saying (or: except the [Torah] kept on saying), "You will continue not putting strong emotions upon something (or: You shall not repeatedly have a strong impulse or desire; You will not constantly crave or covet [other folks' possessions or their gods])." [Ex. 20:17; Deut. 5:21; comment: the "I" of this passage = Adam (Gen. 3) /Israel (Ex. 32) /Paul (in his pre-Christian experience)]

NSB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid! I had not known sin except through the law. For I had not known coveting except the law had said: You should not covet.

ISV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ The Law Shows Us What Sin IsWhat should we say, then? Is the Law sinful? Of course not! In fact, I wouldn’t have become aware of sin if it had not been for the Law. I wouldn’t have known what it means to covet if the Law had not said, “You must not covet.”

LEB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the law sin? May it never be! But I would not have known sin except through the law, for I would not have known covetousness if the law had not said, "Do not covet."*

BGB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία; μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν “Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις·”

BIB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Τί (What) οὖν (then) ἐροῦμεν (shall we say)? ὁ (Is the) νόμος (law) ἁμαρτία (sin)? μὴ (Never) γένοιτο (may it be)! ἀλλὰ (But) τὴν (-) ἁμαρτίαν (sin) οὐκ (not) ἔγνων (I have known), εἰ (if) μὴ (not) διὰ (by) νόμου (law); τήν (-) τε (then) γὰρ (for) ἐπιθυμίαν (covetousness), οὐκ (not) ᾔδειν (I had been conscious of), εἰ (if) μὴ (not) ὁ (the) νόμος (law) ἔλεγεν (had said), “Οὐκ (Not) ἐπιθυμήσεις (you shall covet).”

BLB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? Never may it be! But I have not known sin, if not by Law. And indeed, I had not been conscious of covetousness if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

BSB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”

MSB⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”

MLV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Therefore what shall we say? Is the law sin? Let it not happen! But, I did not know sin, except through the law; for I also did not know coveting.

VIN⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "You shall not covet."

Luther1545⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht ohne durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: Laß dich nicht gelüsten!

Luther1545_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 Was G1508 wollen wir denn G3767 nun G2046 sagen G1492 ? Ist das G3551 Gesetz G266 Sünde G1492 ? Das G235 sei ferne! Aber G266 die Sünde G1097 erkannte G3756 ich nicht G3551 ohne durchs Gesetz G1223 . Denn G1097 ich wußte G1939 nichts von der Lust G3551 , wo das Gesetz G1096 nicht hätte G3004 gesagt G1937 : Laß dich nicht gelüsten!

Luther1912⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht, außer durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten!"

Luther1912_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 Was G2046 wollen G3767 wir denn nun G2046 sagen G3551 ? Ist das Gesetz G266 Sünde G3361 G1096 ? Das sei ferne G235 ! Aber G266 die Sünde G1097 erkannte G3756 ich nicht G1508 , außer G1223 durchs G3551 Gesetz G1063 G5037 . Denn G1492 ich wußte G3756 nichts G1939 von der Lust G1508 , wo G3551 das Gesetz G1508 nicht G3004 hätte gesagt G1937 : «Laß G3756 dich nicht G1937 gelüsten!

ELB1871⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten" .

ELB1871_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 Was G2046 sollen G3767 wir nun G2046 sagen? G3551 Ist das Gesetz G266 Sünde? G1096 Das sei G3361 ferne! G235 Aber G266 die Sünde G1097 hätte G3756 ich nicht G1097 erkannt, G1508 als nur G1223 durch G3551 Gesetz. G1063 G5037 Denn G1939 auch von der Lust G1492 hätte G3756 ich nichts G1492 gewußt, G1508 wenn nicht G3551 das Gesetz G3004 gesagt G1937 hätte: "Laß G3756 dich nicht G1937 gelüsten".

ELB1905⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: »Laß dich nicht gelüsten.«

ELB1905_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 Was G2046 sollen G3767 wir nun G2046 sagen G3551 ? Ist das Gesetz G266 Sünde G1096 ? Das sei G3361 ferne G235 ! Aber G266 die Sünde G1097 hätte G3756 ich nicht G1097 erkannt G1508 , als nur G1223 durch G3551 Gesetz G1063 -G5037 . Denn G1939 auch von der Lust G1492 hätte G3756 ich nichts G1492 gewußt G1508 , wenn nicht G3551 das Gesetz G3004 gesagt G1937 hätte: "Laß G3756 dich nicht G1937 gelüsten ".

DSV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Wat zullen wij dan zeggen? Is de wet zonde? Dat zij verre. Ja, ik kende de zonde niet dan door de wet; want ook had ik de begeerlijkheid niet geweten zonde te zijn, indien de wet niet zeide: Gij zult niet begeren.

DSV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 Wat G3767 zullen wij dan G2046 G5692 zeggen G3551 ? Is de wet G266 zonde G3361 G1096 G5636 ? Dat zij verre G235 . Ja G1097 G5627 , ik kende G266 de zonde G3756 niet G1508 dan G1223 door G3551 de wet G1063 ; want G5037 ook G1939 had ik de begeerlijkheid G3756 niet G1492 G5715 geweten G1487 [zonde] [te] [zijn], indien G3551 de wet G3361 niet G3004 G5707 zeide G3756 : Gij zult niet G1937 G5692 begeren.

DarbyFR⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷
Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? -Qu'ainsi n'advienne! Mais je n'eusse pas connu le péché, si ce n'eût été par la loi; car je n'eusse pas eu conscience de la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: "Tu ne convoiteras point".

Martin⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Que dirons-nous donc ? La Loi est-elle péché ? à Dieu ne plaise! au contraire je n'ai point connu le péché, sinon par la Loi : car je n'eusse pas connu la convoitise, si la Loi n'eût dit : tu ne convoiteras point.

Segond⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? Loin de là! Mais je n'ai connu le péché que par la loi. Car je n'aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point.

Segond_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G5101 ¶ Que G2046 dirons-nous G5692 G3767 donc G3551 ? La loi G266 est-elle péché G3361 ? Loin de là G1096 G5636 G235 G3756 ! Mais je n G1097 ’ai connu G5627 G266 le péché G1508 que G1223 par G3551 la loi G1063 . Car G5037 G1492 je n’aurais G0 G3756 pas G1492 connu G5715 G1939 la convoitise G1508 , si G3551 la loi G3004 n’eût dit G5707 G1937 : Tu ne convoiteras G5692 G3756 point.

SE⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ ¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Pero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley; porque (tampoco) conocería la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.

ReinaValera⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ ¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Empero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley: porque tampoco conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.

JBS⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ ¶ ¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Pero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley; porque (tampoco) conocería la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.

Albanian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Çfarë të themi, pra? Se ligji është mëkat? Ashtu mos qoftë! Mëkatin unë nuk do ta kisha njohur, veç se me anë të ligjit; sepse unë nuk do ta kisha njohur lakminë, po të mos thoshte ligji: ''Mos lakmo!''.

RST⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Что же скажем? Неужели от закона грех? Никак. Но я не иначе узнал грех, как посредством закона. Ибо яне понимал бы и пожелания, если бы закон не говорил: не пожелай.

Peshitta⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ ܡܢܐ ܗܟܝܠ ܐܡܪܝܢܢ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܚܛܝܬܐ ܗܘ ܚܤ ܐܠܐ ܠܚܛܝܬܐ ܠܐ ܝܠܦܬ ܐܠܐ ܒܝܕ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܠܐ ܓܝܪ ܪܓܬܐ ܝܕܥ ܗܘܝܬ ܐܠܘ ܠܐ ܢܡܘܤܐ ܕܐܡܪ ܕܠܐ ܬܪܓ ܀

Arabic⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ فماذا نقول. هل الناموس خطية. حاشا. بل لم اعرف الخطية الا بالناموس. فانني لم اعرف الشهوة لو لم يقل الناموس لا تشته.

Amharic⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ እንግዲህ ምን እንላለን? ሕግ ኃጢአት ነውን? አይደለም፤ ነገር ግን በሕግ ባይሆን ኃጢአትን ባላወቅሁም ነበር፤ ሕጉ። አትመኝ ባላለ ምኞትን ባላወቅሁም ነበርና።

Armenian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Ուրեմն ի՞նչ ըսենք. Օրէնքը մե՞ղք է: Ամե՛նեւին: Նոյնիսկ ես պիտի չգիտնայի մեղքը, եթէ Օրէնքը չըլլար. նաեւ պիտի չգիտնայի ցանկութիւնը, եթէ Օրէնքը ըսած չըլլար. «Մի՛ ցանկար»:

Basque⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Cer erranen dugu beraz? Leguea bekatu da? Guertha eztadila. Aitzitic bekatua eztut eçagutu vkan Legueaz baicen. Ecen eznuqueen eçagutu guthiciá baldin legueac erran ezpalu, Eztuc guthiciaturen.

Bulgarian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Тогава какво да кажем? Законът грях ли е? Да не бъде! Но аз не бих познал греха, освен чрез закона; защото не бих знаел пожелание, ако законът не беше казал: ?Не пожелавай.“

Croatian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Što ćemo dakle reći? Je li Zakon grijeh? Nipošto! Nego: grijeha ne spoznah doli po Zakonu jer za požudu ne bih znao da Zakon nije govorio: Ne poželi!

BKR⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Což tedy díme? Že Zákon jest hříchem? Nikoli; nýbrž hříchu jsem nepoznal, než skrze Zákon. Nebo i o žádosti byl bych nevěděl, aby hříchem byla, by byl Zákon neřekl: Nepožádáš.

Danish⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Hvad skulle vi da sige? Er Loven Synd? Det være langt fra! Men jeg kjendte ikke Synden uden ved Loven; thi end Begjerligheden kjendte jeg ikke, dersom Loven ei havde sagt: du skal ikke begjere.

CUV⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ 這樣，我們可說甚麼呢？律法是罪麼？斷乎不是！只是非因律法，我就不知何為罪。非律法說不可起貪心，我就不知何為貪心。

CUV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G3767 這樣 G2046 ，我們可說 G5101 甚麼 G3551 呢？律法 G266 是罪 G3361 G1096 麼？斷乎不是 G235 ！只是 G1508 非 G1223 因 G3551 律法 G3756 ，我就不 G1097 知 G266 何為罪 G1508 。非 G3551 律法 G3004 說 G3756 不可 G1937 起貪心 G3756 ，我就不 G1492 知 G1939 何為貪心。

CUVS⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ 这样，我们可说甚么呢？律法是罪么？断乎不是！只是非因律法，我就不知何为罪。非律法说不可起贪心，我就不知何为贪心。

CUVS_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

7 G3767 这样 G2046 ，我们可说 G5101 甚么 G3551 呢？律法 G266 是罪 G3361 G1096 么？断乎不是 G235 ！只是 G1508 非 G1223 因 G3551 律法 G3756 ，我就不 G1097 知 G266 何为罪 G1508 。非 G3551 律法 G3004 说 G3756 不可 G1937 起贪心 G3756 ，我就不 G1492 知 G1939 何为贪心。

Esperanto⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Kion do ni diru? CXu la legxo estas peko? Nepre ne! Tamen mi ne konus pekon, krom per la legxo; cxar mi ne konus deziron, se la legxo ne dirus:Ne deziru;

Estonian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Mis me siis ütleme? Ons käsk patt? Mitte sugugi! Ent pattu ma ei oleks tundnud muidu kui käsu kaudu; sest ma ei oleks kurjast himust midagi teadnud, kui käsk ei oleks öelnud: "Sa ei tohi himustada!"

Finnish⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Mitäs me siis sanomme? Onko laki synti? Pois se! Mutta en minä muutoin syntiä olisi tuntenut, ellei lain kautta; sillä en minä olisi himoistakaan mitään tiennyt, ellei laki olisi sanonut: ei sinun pidä himoitseman.

FinnishPR⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Mitä siis sanomme? Onko laki syntiä? Pois se! Mutta syntiä en olisi tullut tuntemaan muuten kuin lain kautta; sillä en minä olisi tiennyt himosta, ellei laki olisi sanonut: "Älä himoitse".

Haitian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Nan kondisyon sa a, kisa n'a di? Eske lalwa se peche? Non, wete sa nan tèt ou. Men, se lalwa a ki fè m' konnen sa peche ye. Se konsa mwen pa ta janm konnen kisa ki rele gen lanvi, si lalwa pa t' di m': Piga ou janm pote lanvi sou sak pa pou nou.

Hungarian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Mit mondunk tehát? A törvény bûn-é? Távol legyen: sõt inkább a bûnt nem ismertem, hanem csak a törvény által; mert a kívánságról sem tudtam volna, ha a törvény nem mondaná: Ne kívánjad.

Indonesian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Kalau begitu, apakah yang dapat kita katakan? Bahwa hukum agama Yahudi jahat? Tentu tidak! Tetapi hukum itulah yang mengajar saya tentang dosa. Saya tidak akan tahu tamak itu apa, kalau hukum agama tidak mengatakan, "Janganlah tamak."

Italian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Che diremo adunque? che la legge sia peccato? Così non sia; anzi, io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per la legge; perciocchè io non avrei conosciuta la concupiscenza, se la legge non dicesse: Non concupire.

ItalianRiveduta⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Che diremo dunque? La legge è essa peccato? Così non sia; anzi io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per mezzo della legge; poiché io non avrei conosciuto la concupiscenza, se la legge non avesse detto: Non concupire.

Japanese⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ さらば何をか言はん、律法は罪なるか、決して然らず、律法に由らでは、われ罪を知らず、律法に『貪る勿れ』と言わずば、慳貪を知らざりき。

Kabyle⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Acu ara d-nini ihi, eɛni ccariɛa deg-s ddnub ? Xaṭi! Lameɛna lemmer ulac ccariɛa tili ur țissineɣ ara d acu i d ddnub. Axaṭer lemmer ur d-tenni ara ccariɛa : ur ṭṭamaɛ ara, tilli ur ẓriɣ ara belli ṭṭmeɛ d leḥṛam ?

Korean⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ 그런즉 우리가 무슨 말 하리요 율법이 죄냐 그럴 수 없느니라 율법으로 말미암지 않고는 내가 죄를 알지 못하였니 곧 율법이 탐내지 말라 하지 아니하였더면 내가 탐심을 알지 못하였으리라

Latvian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Ko tad lai sakām? Vai likums ir grēks? Nekādā ziņā! Bet es grēka nepazītu, ja nebūtu likuma, jo es nezinātu, kas ir iekāre, ja likums nesacītu: Tev nebūs iekārot!

Lithuanian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Ką tad pasakysime? Gal įstatymas yra nuodėmė? Jokiu būdu! Bet aš nebūčiau pažinęs nuodėmės, jei nebūtų įstatymo. Nebūčiau suvokęs geismo, jei įstatymas nebūtų pasakęs: “Negeisk!”

PBG⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Cóż tedy rzeczemy? Iż zakon jest grzechem? Nie daj tego Boże! I owszemem grzechu nie poznał, tylko przez zakon; bo i o pożądliwości bym był nie wiedział, by był zakon nie rzekł: Nie będziesz pożądał.

Portuguese⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Que diremos pois? É a lei pecado? De modo nenhum. Contudo, eu não conheci o pecado senão pela lei; porque eu não conheceria a concupiscência, se a lei não dissesse: Não cobiçarás.

Norwegian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Hvad skal vi da si? er loven synd? Langt derifra! men jeg kjente ikke synden uten ved loven; for begjærligheten kjente jeg ikke dersom ikke loven hadde sagt: Du skal ikke begjære.

Romanian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Deci ce vom zice? Legea este ceva păcătos? Nici de cum! Dimpotrivă, păcatul nu l-am cunoscut decît prin Lege. De pildă, n'aş fi cunoscut pofta, dacă Legea nu mi-ar fi spus:,,Să nu pofteşti!``

Ukrainian⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Що ж скажемо? Чи Закон то гріх? Зовсім ні! Але я не пізнав гріха, як тільки через Закон, бо я не знав би пожадливости, коли б Закон не наказував: Не пожадай.

UkrainianNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ⁷ Що ж скажемо? закон гріх? Нехай не буде так. Нї, я й не знав гріха, як тільки через закон, і жадоби не відав би, коли б закон не сказав: Не жадай.